- Only a dynamic flux produces an emf, not a static flux.
- A dynamic flux is not necessarily produced by a dynamic magnetic field. The vector area $\vec A$ could also vary in time!
- Why the negative sign? It gives right the direction of the induced current.
- Experimental law that summarizes the experiments of Michael Faraday and Joseph Henry in the beginning of the XIX century.
- This law is at the heart of any electric generating station, which converts other forms of energy into electric energy(gravitational energy at hydroelectric plants, chemical energy in a coal-fired plant, or nuclear energy in a nuclear power plant)
#How to find the direction of the emf
- Fix direction of vector area $\vec A$.
- In combination with the magnetic field, determine the sign of the magnetic flux (through the dot product $\vec{B} \cdot d \vec{A}$)
- Determine the sign of the induced emf or current using Faraday’s law: when the flux increases, the induced emf or current decreases and vice versa.
- Finally, use the right-hand rule to determine the direction of the induced emf or current. For a positive emf, it is in thee same direction as your curled fingers, and negative otherwise.
![[Pasted image 20240306212202.png]]
#Induced Electric Field
We can understand the emf induced in a moving conductor based on Lorentz forces, but what drives the charges around the circuit when the conductor is still and there is only a changing magnetic flux?
Let us re-express Faraday’s law using the definition of an emf
$$ \oint_{C} \vec{E} \cdot d \vec{l}=-\frac{d}{d t} \int_{S} \vec{B} \cdot \vec{n} d A $$There has to be an induced electric field in the conductor caused by a changing magnetic flux!
Remarks:
- Contrary to what we study for a static fields, this electric field does not fulfill $\oint_{C} \vec{E} \cdot d \vec{l}=0$, hence it is not conservative and the concept of potential is meaningless! Only when $\frac{d \Phi_{B}}{d t}=0$ we recover a conservative field $\vec E$. Nonetheless, the definition $\vec F=q\vec E$ is always correct.